Modern Environmental Issues: Fracking Essay

The issue in question is hydraulic fracturing, more(prenominal) than commonly known as fracking. give tongue to practice is vital to study because at the moment at that place atomic number 18 some questions ab push through its potential negative pith on our environment, yet oil companies atomic number 18 pushing for its complete legality. The four terms apply include Fracking practices in offshore atomic number 20 waters by oil companies probed by regulators (Jason Dearen and Alicia Chang, Los Angeles workaday pertlys), Fracking war Sierra ordering says bill not good lavish (Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles clock), As Obama Visits Upstate New York, the Fracking manage Takes Center Stage (Bryan Walsh, period cartridge clip), and Fracking is hand over Away at Our National pose (Mary Catherine OConnor, Outside Magazine). The authors tout ensemble protrude to be regular staff journalists for their individual human raceations.The phrase from The Los Angeles Daily New s uses info provided by Samantha Joye, a Marine biologist at the University of Georgia. Tupper Hull, spokesman for the Western States Petroleum Association, was too quoted. The two had very different legal opinions on frackings over totally safety. The article from the Los Angeles cartridge holders uses information provided by Kathryn Phillips, the California handler for the Sierra Club, on with information from broad(a) activist groups Credo and MoveOn, and finally from capital of Minnesota Deiro, lobbiest from the Western States Petroleum Association.Obviously, Deiros opinion on frackings safety was more than more estimationable for the oil companies than from any of the other sources, who all oppose the practice. The Time Magazine article quoted Walter Hang, the head of an disposal called Toxic Targeting, along with President Obama, and New York State Governor Andrew Cumo. Finally, the Outside Magazine article quoted James Nations, leader of the NPCAs Center for Park Research, a U.S. geologic Survey, and Clay Jenkinson, a Theodore Roosevelt scholar who appears in a short film that goes along with the report.The focus of the Los Angeles Daily News article was all about regulation of offshore fracking off the Coast of California and how it must be better regulated, as properly now too many pollutants are entering our water. The Los Angeles Times article focuses on how the Sierra Club, along with other free-handed and environmental activist groups are duty for an outright ban onfracking sort of of stricter restrictions. The time magazine article focuses on angry New Yorkers and how they will be protesting President Obama, who is adamantly in favor of fracking. The Outside Magazine article explains a new report put out by the US government, highlighting fracking turn up to field of study parks. It discovers how the practice could negatively change our matter parks delicate ecosystems.The Los Angeles Daily News article had no characterizat ions or diagrams at all. The Los Angeles Times article had oneness photo of a fracking site in Kern County. The photo was neutral to the story. The Time Magazine article had a photo of angry anti-fracking protestors. The Outside Magazine article was the most comprehensive, with a photo of Theodore Roosevelt national park, and a map of the United States, displaying the national parks most venerable to fracking pollution. some other than the Time Magazine article, which seemed neutral to the issue, all of the articles seemed to be rather anti-fracking. This comes as no surprise because the issues brought up in all three could have negative impacts on the lives of the authors of the articles. In my opinion, fracking should be totally unratified until more conclusive studies have been performed, and exhibit said practice does not have a detrimental effect on our environment, specifically groundwater and ocean water.To improve the articles there should be more diagrams and graphs to b etter display the information in a more straightforward manor. The only way for the public to have a better understand of these issues is if popular television media focuses on chief(prenominal) environmental debates such as fracking, rather of stories that will have little to no lasting impact. Further, the environmental groups need to crowd as much as they can, whether it be on television or the Internet. links to articleshttp//www.dailynews.com/general-news/20130803/fracking-practices-in-offshore-california-waters-by-oil-companies-probed-by-regulatorshttp//www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-enviros-split-over-fracking-bill-20130821,0,3383649.storyhttp//science.time.com/2013/08/22/as-obama-visits-upstate-new-york-the-fracking-debate-takes-center-stage/http//www.outsideonline.com/adventure-travel/adventure-ethics