Is Is a Flat World? Essay

Freidman summarizes the three globalisations that wear occurred in the terra firma. The first atomic number 53 in 1492-1800, making the humans to a medium size. Second whizz in 1800 to 2000 making the terra firma to a size small and triplet one starting in 2000 making the world unconditioned subsequently all these old age of developing technology causing to become an commix and smooth tire world. Freidmans 10 cases and forces starting in Nov. 9, 1989 with Berlin Walls falling down mention how the world get straightawaytened so fast. He mentions in these 10 events the Netscape moment offering the dot-com and connecting lot in a way never beforehand.This enable Indian engineers which years back when the world wasnt widend didnt had the opportunity to compete in a position with an American to be enlisted for outsourcing. With these events the world suddenly began outsourcing, offshoring, open-sourcing, insourcing, supply-chaining and ratting people and connecting them, showing the world a whole new melodic theme that we ar living in a broaden world. The final event he called it the steroids which is the wireless access that enables you to connect with every person you unavoidableness from anywhere with any device.Which is contrary to what Ghemawat says, People argon getting more connected but they arent connecting (pg. 58 Ghemawat, 2005). The fact is that people are spending time chatting with family and friends that meeting someone to start a flat world. It is true that not everyone has the access to technology, but is a fact that individually day more people get connected and collaborating to this than ever before in historys life, this is the first step for a globalise world.Americans had become lazier in innovating probably because they never thought that globalization would be knocking in their front doors. This is not a test Freidman says, is already happening and the soonest you prepare for this the soonest you will be split of thi s flattened world. Why the World Isnt Flat by Pankaj Ghemawat is serious the opposite as everything Freidman tells, making an burlesque to all this presumption of the world being flat. In the article he states facts proving we are far forward from a fully globalized world.He evidences this by stating, 90% of all visit calls, web traffic and investment is global. Freidmans 10 forces seem convincing but Ghemawats The 10 Percent Presumption proved him wrong. In these presumptions it shows that immigration, phone calls, direct investment, and others dont even exceed the 10% in levels of internationalization across industries. Patents and portfolio investment barely exceeds the 10% and avocation hardly beats the 20%. Even with trades being the highest you cannot have a globalize world with that percentage shown.For Ghemawat all of this flat world that Freidman says contains an exaggeration whitethornbe in order to sell books and that we in fact are more cautious and prefer to be i n a protectionism world. Although study(ip) revolutions as the Internet has improved the way we globally integrate, the barrier where globalizations principles expression, geography and distance doesnt matter is still not functioning at all. Russias local service Yandex beating up Google because they dont have the ability to understand the complexities of the Russian language proves that we are not living in a globalize world.He also states that there is a affright of fit a globalize world as tendency is supporting more protectionism and that globalization may be incompatible While Freidmans posture is mentioning that a flat world involves everyone around, as a video-conference with the entire supply chain of the alliance and different employees all at once. You need to leave protectionism and a fear of being globalized and knowing youre in a flat world when your office has eight different clocks.Ghemawat mentions that people like Friedman are describing globalization, as a wor ld that doesnt exists. The lawfulness is for Freidman that people dont know but we are actually living a globalization that is shown by stating a fact that China graduates twice students with bachelors degree than US. America is falling behind he says, but the truth is that everyone is falling behind if they dont realize that the world is becoming more flat and less round. The World is Spiky by Richard Florida mentions that the world is more harrowing and less flat as Freidman says.He refers high-pitched with a map as the different peaks around the world and how they arent constant but significantly diverse that you cannot call it a flat world as Freidman. There had been a growth in countries with the major cities but they are leaving their other cities behind this process of globalization. Florida says this peaky globalization in big countries like China are knockout their production, innovation in their rural regions leaving the urban outside of this making them have conflicts .Instead of a flatter world is becoming a spiky world with peaks dispersed all around it but in an inconsistent way. Instead of raising spikes, there needs to be valleys to have equality in their peaks for a flat world to come and hes arguing why Freidman left this gap between the wretched and rich behind. Also the article by Matt Taibbi Flathead for the New York Press, says he is not surprised about what Freidman says because he always continues to fail his metaphors in this case the world being flat.Arguing in favor of the exaggerations Ghemawat verbalise about Freidman and the harrowing the world is as Florida. I cerebrate that Freidman overstate of the world being flat but also I believe this is just what we need in order to have a indigence and not getting stuck in the laziness and comfort. Maybe this fear of globalization people have, is because they know that theyre living in a globalize world where they can be left behind if they dont realize the fact that today the worl d is becoming more flat and less round or spiky.